On Wed, 2002-05-15 at 14:20, Michael Sweet wrote: > OK, for the purposes of clarification, how does the following > additional sentence sound: > > No developer is required to provide these exceptions in a > derived work. > > I've put the ammended license agreement up on the CUPS server > for your complete review: > > http://www.cups.org/new-license.html
As far as I can tell, this seems to meet all concerns. The placement is key, I think. (The sentence applies to all of the GPL exceptions, not just the Apple one.) But, I'm probably biased. :-) Hopefully, someone else will chime in. Thanks for working with us on this, BTW. Not all upstream authors are this easy to work with. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]