On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 01:37:39PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > The one-sentence quote in the bug report doesn't give me enough > information to substantiate this assertion, but if you're right, then I > would say that the software is not DFSG-free.
Here is the complete section of the html documentation concerning licence (/usr/share/htp/ref/intro.htm): <H2>Distribution</H2> htp is a public domain utility. There is absolutely no charge for it's use. No charge can be incurred for the redistribution of this utility beyond material costs. All distributions of htp must include all files contained in the archive it was originally packaged in. Any questions regarding distribution should be directed to Jim Nelson at <A HREF="mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]">[EMAIL PROTECTED]</A>. A full distribution package can be obtained at the htp home page, listed above. <P> This on-line reference is considered documention for htp, and is therefore subject to the same conditions of distribution as the actual utility. <P> If you actively use htp and find it useful and worthwhile, I would appreciate placing a hyperlink on one of your pages pointing to the htp home page. As Steve Langasek said, the first sentence might indicate that the upstream author just ignored the consequences of putting a constraint on fees. -Ralf. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
