> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:38:47AM +0100, David Carlisle wrote: >>> But you have *no* way to assure this, short of trademarking the name >>> "latex". >> >> That is a very tired argument. >> Of course it is true as written, but it ignores the fact that LPPL has >> been remarkably successful in its stated aims. > > Why do you believe that moving these things to a separate document, > asking people to do this in good faith, would be any less successful > than trying to force them to in a license?
Experience. The question «how to modify book.sty?» is a FAQ, and the problem happened before the lppl was introduced (and it was one of the reasons it was adopted, I think). Javier -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
