On Mon, 22 Jul 2002, Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
> For debian people: please consider this. I believe this voids many of the
> intents of the license, as previously mentioned (sysadmins can use this
> remapping feature to make \documentclass{article} load some other file
> instead of 'article.cls'), but this is also the reason FSF agreed that it
> is a free software license.
It's clearly a judgment of "how intrusive is it". Arguments that it's not
very intrusive show (IMO) that this requirement should be removed from the
license.
In other words: if it doesn't matter, why require it?
--
Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.dagon.net/>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
