Glenn Maynard wrote: > I'm not a DD. For those interested in my opinion anyway: What if I > want to modify Latex to remove the filename mapping? If the > DFSG-freeness is dependent on that mechanism, then I can't remove it > (for the best or worst of technical reasons) and have it remain > DFSG-free. Having freeness dependent on a feature being present is > strange.
What's wrong with the conditional statement (unproven assertion:) "The LPPL-1.3 is DFSG-free, but only when applied to software which makes the file-renaming requirement easy" This is essentially what is said about the GFDL, "It's DFSG-free only if no options are used in the document" --Joe -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
