Frank Mittelbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > the problem with Don's work is, that you have to make assumptions or raise > opinions on what he means. but assuming he clarifies or you pick an > interpretation it then needs a discussion on whether it fits the not > completely unambiguous, interpretable, non-legalistic DFSG. right?
I think there is actually no problem with Knuth's work. The LPPL, however, does *not* describe the Knuth "license" at all. It's a very very different document. Nothing in the Knuth "license" speaks of renaming filenames.
