On Wed, 2002-10-23 at 16:35, Branden Robinson wrote: > An intellectual decision is not necessarily an act of originality. > You're making a "sweat-of-the-brow" argument. That doesn't hold water > in the U.S. I'd appreciate cites of statues in countries where it does, > or English-language discussions in countries where the law is not > written in English[1].
Telstra Corporation Ltd v Desktop Marketing Systems Pty Ltd (2001) FCA 612 is an Australian decision (currently on appeal) explicitly respecting Feist. -- -Dave Turner GPL Compliance Engineer Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF
