(first off, I'm not in debian-legal, Cc: me please) On Mon, Nov 18, 2002 at 09:17:16PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > >>>>> "Colin" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Colin> I don't see how they can prevent a clean-room competing > Colin> implementation without software patents. A license on > Colin> their code does nothing to other implementations. > (...) > > Followups set to debian-legal >
On this issue, I would appreciate a peer-review of the Debian Java
FAQ [1] from people at debian-legal, specially for the license-related
chapter [2]. Is everyone ok on the wording/explanations?
Regards
Javi
[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/
[2] http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch2.html#s2.3
pgpE4h2238jpH.pgp
Description: PGP signature
