Giacomo Catenazzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > First paragraph: ok. > Second paragraph: (legally should the "this copyright" replaced with > "this licence"?)
Yes, that would be better. > But the trouble: > Function 'hash' has unknow origin > So IMHO, IANAL, we should not assume GPL not GPL compatible license > ot the code, right? That's correct, we should not make such an assumption. > So the function is very simple, enought simple to be free? > Anyone kwnow a similar function but GPLized or PD (to replace this > function)? Being simple really doesn't matter. However, glibc contains the function, so I'd just snarf the version from there.
