Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It seems like a polite letter to the appropriate standards body would > be in order here. The current license is close enough to what is > needed that there are really only minor modifications needed. The > license needs to explicitly allow distribution of modified versions > (although it may require a prominent notice stating that it is not the > "real" standard"), and it needs to allow use for any purpose. If > someone sends a polite letter, we might very well get a letter back > saying "Of course you can do that".
Since miscfiles is a GNU package, I'll ask the GNU Project advisors for their advice and maybe they can straighten it all out.
