On Mon, 2003-02-10 at 17:38, Richard Stallman wrote: > These are really important projects that claim to be free in the sense > of freedom. But I'd like to know, what Free Software Foundation and > readers of debian-legal think about those licences. So, please, evaluate > those licences carefully > > The Creative Commons licenses are not supposed to be used for software. > Doesn't the Creative Commons site say so? It ought to. > > https://www.helixcommunity.org/ > > Helix DNA is multi-licenced software project. One of those licences is > meant to be compatible with Open Source Definition. > > The draft I saw was not a free software license. I don't know if they > have changed it. If you send me a copy I will take a look.
The FSF has been working with the Real people on the license. It's a slow process, but the dialog is ongoing and productive. They have a strong interest in making the license into a GPL-compatible Free Software license. -- -Dave Turner GPL Compliance Engineer Support my work: http://svcs.affero.net/rm.php?r=novalis&p=FSF
