Russell Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Henning Makholm writes: > > This denies a user the right to make modifications and distribute the > > modified software (with source code) to his neighbour *without* also > > distributing it to the public at large. > > > > The consensus on debian-legal that this right is a sine qua non for > > DFSG-freedom is strong and well established. > > Where does it say this in the DFSG?
Number 3 requires this. > > which I take to mean that one who accepts the license must effectively > > give Apple a royalty-free license to use each an every patent he > > controls. > > Where does it say this in the DFSG? Numbers 1 and 3 requires this.
