On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 01:55:22PM -0800, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote:
> > This simple approach appeals to me, not least because it makes the GNU
> > GPL more easily applicable to things that aren't software:
> > 
> > source form = preferred form for modification of the Work
> > object form = any other form of the Work
> 
> It seems foolish for us to declare this definitively when I don't
> think we've thought through all the possible consequences.  I do think
> that what you say is the right idea; I'm just not confident that we
> won't realize someday that there really is some third category.

Well, let's get to thinkin', then.  I've still got a DFCL to write (;-))
and this issue is important.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |     If God had intended for man to go
Debian GNU/Linux                   |     about naked, we would have been
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |     born that way.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |

Attachment: pgpPbMfvMOzTz.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to