On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 05:44:29AM +1000, Anthony Towns wrote: > On Sun, Mar 16, 2003 at 03:48:04PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > > That's sidestepping the issue. Now: In which of Mark's cases should > > Joe be forced to give his program to the upstrem author, Debian, the > > FSF, or the government? > > I don't see any problems with him being required to present it on request > to some particular person/group in any of the cases, as long as the > requests aren't unduly unreasonable.
What does that mean? What's your definition of "unduly unreasonable"? Would you care to share some "pet tests" with us that would help us to better understand what you think of as "unduly unresonable", versus the preferable (I suppose) "duly unresonable"? -- G. Branden Robinson | Don't use nuclear weapons to Debian GNU/Linux | troubleshoot faults. [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- US Air Force Instruction 91-111 http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |
pgpg9utGlpcZW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
