On Sun, 23 Mar 2003 00:45:59 +0000, John Goerzen wrote: > Hi, > > Does anyone know what the consensus on MPL 1.0 is? I'd like to package > up pilot-mailsync, and it's licensed under that version.
mozilla-browser, libnss3, libxmltok1, parts of pcmcia-cs and libnspr4 are some packages already licensed under MPL. The differences between 1.0 and 1.1 is mainly that 1.1 does not purport to grant you a licence to third parties' patent claims. This shouldn't affect its DFSG status AFAIK. > Additionally, is it permissible to link that software with software > under the no-advert-clause BSD license? Yes. Enhydra is an example. -- JEREMY MALCOLM <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Personal: http://www.malcolm.id.au Providing online networks of Australian lawyers (http://www.ilaw.com.au) and Linux experts (http://www.linuxconsultants.com.au) for instant help! Disclaimer: http://www.terminus.net.au/disclaimer.html. GPG key: finger.
