On 2003-04-16 14:28:44 -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > I understand the rationale. I'm concerned about the wording. Would the > following violate 5(c)? > > % LaTeX-Foobar 1.2.9, copyright 2001--2003 John A. Doe > % > % Please report errors to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. > % > % MODIFIED BY Jack Smith 2003/04/10 to improve widow and orphan > % handling. > % > % Please report errors in this version to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and do > % not use John Doe's address.
Yes (at least it's considered very bad practice). But it would probably be tolerated (grudgingly) if the modification note came first. Too many lusers can't read documentation and use the first address they can find. Best regards Martin -- Our position is that whatever grievances a nation may have, however objectionable it finds the status quo, aggressive warfare is an illegal means for settling those grievances or for altering those conditions. (Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, the American prosecutor at the Nuremberg trials, in his opening statement to the tribunal)