|| On Wed, 16 Apr 2003 09:06:51 -0400 || Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The GFDL deeks to do the same thing. Only this time you find >> yourself in the position of middleman and have to take care to not >> violate the rights of either party. psg> Quite the opposite actually. Any redistributor can add psg> invariant sections which makes sharing difficult. Yes. But that is a question of Copyright law, not license. Given that a document is under a license that permits modification, any redistributor could add anything and then say that removing it would hurt his or her moral rights. Any license trying to allow modification/removal of such sections would run a higher risk of being ruled invalid as a whole because these are inalienable rights. So by having no possibility for invariant sections in a documentation license, all you do is increase the possibility that it will one day be ruled to be invalid as a whole. Regards, Georg -- Georg C. F. Greve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Free Software Foundation Europe (http://fsfeurope.org) Brave GNU World (http://brave-gnu-world.org)
pgpU5NGm6eH3p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
