Sam Hartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>>> "Henning" == Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Henning> Scripsit "Michael D. Crawford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> I don't have any invariant sections in any of them, but each of > >> them specifies a brief back cover text: > > >> Is that a problem? > > Henning> My impression of the consensus that is shaping up is that > Henning> we're likely to consider *any* cover text as a > Henning> problem. The one you use does not seem to be particularly > Henning> obnoxious in itself, but it would be confusing and > Henning> unmanageable to use that kind of judgements for including > Henning> some docs and rejecting others. > > > How is this any worse than an advertizing clause or a requirement to > make a statement in supporting documentation? We consider both of > those free.
It can be misleading or wrong, and you'll never be able to take it out. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]