Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alan Woodland wrote: > > Im looking into packaging quake 1 for debian at the moment > > Quake 1 was in debian before. I forget why we dropped it, but I think it > had little to do with licensing and a lot to do with the maintainer at > the time. Anyway, I'm pretty sure this license was discussed a/ long time > ago, and looked ok then. We may have even contacted Id back then and > gotten some kind of clarification. Not that a second look is a bad idea.
I couldn't find any discussion in the archives. Do you have a link? As for the actual license, I think that the intent is for Debian to fall under the scope of a "Provider", but I'm not completely convinced it does. Clarification would be nice. As for the last sentence in part 6: Further, ID grants to you, the end-user, the limited right to distribute, free of charge only, the Software as a whole. It only applies to end-users, and Debian is certainly not an end-user. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
