David B Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm not asking Debian to include components in main. Those components >> are already in main. I'm asking to keep in main GNU documentations. > > You're asking us to keep non-Free documentation in main. The difference > between that and asking to "include components in main" is irrelevant > and a lawyer's point.
Again, you do consider DFSG applies to documentation. If so, I agree with you. But I'm personaly not convinced (yet) it should be. >> RMS himself gave no hope to a near modification of the GNU FDL. > > I don't care what RMS may or may not do. Why do *you*? It is completely Because it was RMS's reply that was quoted in the first message of the thread, don't you recall? > irrelevant to the discussion. All that matters is whether the licenses > are Free, or not. It's that simple. And also if we have a hope to see the license being modified. > So, to sum up: I don't care what RMS may or may not be doing at this > very moment. I don't care about your opinions towards GNU. The only > thing I care about is whether the GNU Emacs documentation is covered by > a non-Free license or a Free license. No you don't care: you don't use Emacs. -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
