Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > Documentation relating to software needs to be really free, in order >> > that we can manipulate it in far more interesting ways (such as >> > refcarding it, embedding it as online help, or updating it because >> > of advances in the program it documents). This is a transformation >> > much more intrusive than merely reformatting it or similar actions >> > which you would >> >> GFDL permits this I think. But you have to keep the invariant section. > > Then it doesn't permit it, does it? > You still haven't addressed this point.
But you didn't reply to questions I asked yesterday following your examples, embedding pieces of docs in software that is. >> AFAIK, Emacs is not linked to its documentation. > > I've addressed this and you never commented. I'm sorry if I haven't. Could you point me to this reference please? >> Writing docs is something people don't like. Let's be realistic. > > I've addressed this as well. It's not relevant and I wished you'd stop > using it as an argument. Your right that it's not relevant but shouldn't we consider the world we live in? -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org
