On Wed, 30 Apr 2003, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 30, 2003 at 12:15:32AM +0200, > Henning Makholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote > a message of 33 lines which said: > > > ?) The GFDL is not free when applied to documents if any of > > the "invariant" or "cover" options are exercised. > > Is it a consensus on debian-legal that a GFDL work *without* any > Invariant or Cover is indeed free and has no problem being distributed > in "main"?
I haven't noticed any arguments to the contrary. I'm sure anyone who does will make their views known... <g> - Matt
