RMS said: >Reiser's statement was inaccurate. For GPL version 3 we are >considering requirements for preserving certain limited author >information in the source code, and making explicit that other >GPL-compatible licenses that are present on parts of the code cannot >be removed from the source, but nothing beyond that.
*Heaves big sigh of relief* OK, I'm happy. :-) Thanks for the reassurances. -- Nathanael Nerode <neroden at gcc.gnu.org> Don't use the GNU FDL for free documentation. See <http://home.twcny.rr.com/nerode/neroden/fdl.html>