On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:49:07PM +0100, Andrew Suffield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 45 lines which said:
> This is why, when using the GPL for things which are not clearly > program source code, you must always specify what the preferred form > for modification is (append it to the license declaration, which > should be just below the copyright declaration). This would be a serious limitation of freedom! If someone writes a free document in LinuxDoc/SGML and I translate it to DocBook/XML before modifying it, I violate the licence? [Do note that I mentioned only free formats and a realistic case.]