I just looked at the license for some Apache software, like Xalan, Xerces of FOP. I noticed that it forbids the use of their name in derived work without written permission.
IIUC, it is absolutely not DFSG-compliant, is it? It means that Debian must have written permission to redistribute the packages, else we are not repecting the terms of the ASL. And if Debian have the permission, then the package don't meet the point 8 in the DFSG. Legally, le Moine Fou -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] OpenPGP 0xD9D50D8A
pgpbFyLyPPJ8c.pgp
Description: PGP signature
