On Fri, 22 Aug 2003, John Goerzen wrote: > One of the main sticking points with the GFDL is the use of invariant > sections
But not the only sticking point, I'm afraid. > I suggest that even if the GFDL did not allow modification of the invariant > sections, if it at least allowed removal of them, we would be in much better > shape. Vastly better shape. I still believe the other problems with the GFDL would render it non-free, but at least it wouldn't be as bizarrely contrary to what I thought the FSF stood for. > What do people here think about that, and is there any indication if the FSF > would be amenable to this change? Aside from one secondhand comment on this list, I've seen no indication that the FSF is amenable to any discussion of possible changes. -- Mark Rafn [EMAIL PROTECTED] <http://www.dagon.net/>
