Jérôme Marant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Quoting Jeremy Hankins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> > We don't agree? So what?
>>
>> Oh, I certainly disagree with you, but that wasn't my point -- others
>> are doing a fine job of making that argument. But if I did agree with
>> you, can you imagine the flame wars that would result if we had to
>> decide, on a case-by-case basis, whether or not Debian could permit
>> and/or support various invariant screeds? I have a feeling l.d.o
>> would simply explode!
>
> Hey, non-software-related invariants would be rejected, at least. :-)
But since Debian distributes only software, and Invariants must be
Secondary... actually, isn't the GNU Manifesto non-secondary when
distributed as part of Debian GNU/Whatever?
-Brian
--
Brian T. Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.evenmere.org/~bts/
