On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 11:35:16AM +0100, MJ Ray wrote: > Why have we another sudden influx of people who haven't read any of > the history on this? (Rhetorical. I think we can guess.)
I'll answer it anyway: it's because our conclusions are reaching a wider audience, which means we have more people to convince. If you get impatient, I suggest collecting some of the FAQ-like documents that were posted and referenced here (Nathaniel's was pretty good), and turning those into a single document for new people to read. (I'd do it myself if I weren't too lame.) Richard Braakman
