Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As for GPL 3, do you intend to use clauses similar to invariant sections > or to the technical measures stuff in GFDL section 2? This is a matter > of concern on this list. > > That surprises me, since I believe I sent a message to this list > answering that precise question, two or three months ago. > > I cannot find that message easily--the only way I can search my large > volume of mail is with grep. If a substantial number of people are > concerned, can one of them look up my previous message and repost it?
Do you mean this? http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2003/debian-legal-200306/msg00173.html Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I look forward to read a draft of the GPL v3, since Hans Reiser did > mention that the equivalent of 'Invariant Sections' would be added > in the forthcoming GPL v3. > > Reiser's statement was inaccurate. For GPL version 3 we are > considering requirements for preserving certain limited author > information in the source code, and making explicit that other > GPL-compatible licenses that are present on parts of the code cannot > be removed from the source, but nothing beyond that. Regards, Walter Landry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
