Quoting Mark Rafn ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Here's a thought: Dual-licensed works can generally be forked to be under > either license. Doesn't this mean that the maintainer (or any distributor) > of a "GPLv2 or any later version" work could unilaterally re-release it > under pure GPLv2 without consulting any contributors?
I think so: He could then use that as the basis (if I understand correctly) for a pure GPLv2 fork. Other people, encountering that but preferring a code instance under "GPLv2 or any later version" would need to seek out an upstream version and eschew his additions. -- <BLINK>Resize your browser so the following line touches both margins!</BLINK> <HR WIDTH="75%"> Best Regards, Rick Moen, [EMAIL PROTECTED]