On 2003-08-30 16:08:03 +0100 Mathieu Roy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It's up to the author of the documentation to decide what he thinks
important to be in the documentation he's writing.
If you think that, how about: it was up to the authors of the DFSG to
decide what it applies to.
[...]
But a political stand about computers within a documentation
describing the software does not seems a problem to me: it documents
the software!
It's not a problem to Debian either, but you must make it free
software.
It's the purpose of the documentation. While at the
contrary, including the manifesto within emacs, for instance, does not
require a protection (it's not a part of the software and can be
safely removed, if present).
I don't understand this section. We cannot remove the GNU Manifesto
from the Emacs manual, can we? (I'd rather we didn't, anyway, but it
looks like we must.)
--
MJR/slef My Opinion Only and possibly not of any group I know.
http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ jabber://[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Creative copyleft computing services via http://www.ttllp.co.uk/
