On Sat, Sep 06, 2003 at 08:16:11PM +0100, Andrew Suffield wrote: > No, prohibiting DRM systems is unambiguously non-free under the DFSG. > > It just happens to be _silly_ right now.
Er. How's that again?
How is this significantly different than section 6 of the GPL, which
forbids you from putting any further restrictions on anyone who receives a
copy (the inherent purpose of DRM systems, presumably, being to limit how
far a copy can propagate, the antithesis of Free documentation).
Or am I missing something glaringly obvious here?
--
Joel Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ,''`.
Debian GNU NetBSD/i386 porter : :' :
`. `'
`-
pgpSZR69SATo1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
