On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 04:03:17PM +0300, Richard Braakman wrote: > I also find it hard to bend my mind in such a way that a copy of the > GPL is a section that "deals exclusively with the relationship of the > publishers or authors of the Document to the Document's overall > subject (or to related matters)". How is this a Secondary Section? > > (Here's a test: after gawk moves to GPLv3, is it important to keep > a copy of the GPLv2 in the documentation? Would you add the GPLv3 > as an Invariant Section? If so, why?)
You may want to send these questions to RMS. He is not subscribed to -legal, as far as I know. On the other hand, there is sometimes a downside to mailing RMS questions. :) -- G. Branden Robinson | Damnit, we're all going to die; Debian GNU/Linux | let's die doing something *useful*! [EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Hal Clement, on comments that http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | space exploration is dangerous
pgpRMyORhaCQ1.pgp
Description: PGP signature
