Anthony DeRobertis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > On Tuesday, Sep 9, 2003, at 12:29 US/Eastern, Mathieu Roy wrote: > > > > So a country were you are free to kill a girl without any legal risk > > is a country DFSG compliant? > > Please cite the specific paragraph of the DFSG that has _anything_ to > do with killing people.
None. Because DFSG is about free _software_. Not about any freedom you can imagine. > > Basically, the freedoms I think important for a software are expressed > > at gnu.org of at debian.org. > > The freedoms I think important for documentation are expressed at > > http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html > > If you feel the DFSG is not appropriate for documentation, propose > changing the Social Contract on -project. By reading -legal, I do not think it would have any success. So it's not an option right now. But to be able to discuss about this whole issue, I think important to keep in mind that - not everything on earth is software - people may completely agree on freedom that matters for software - people may disagree on freedom that matters for political / historical text and it does not means they are "corrupted". -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english
