Steve Dobson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > But are you supporting the GFDL as a way of getting the message out? > Or do you, like me, see it as a weapon that can be used to distribute > propaganda? While a document licensed under the GFDL may not contain > any propaganda today, that does not mean that it will not tomorrow.
I see the GFDL as destructive and wrongheaded, an attempt to do something reasonable by an entirely unreasonable method. A reasonable method would be, say, to include it in the manual without a special license "protection". To put it in the motd, or the Emacs startup message. And so forth.
