[RMS and Walter Landry omitted from CC list] On Tue, Sep 16, 2003 at 02:17:42PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > Walter Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Richard Stallman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> To the readers of this message: if you are a Debian developer and you > >> do, or perhaps might, support including manuals covered by the GFDL > >> (without expecting it to change) in Debian, please write to me and > >> tell me. (I am not subscribed to debian-legal and could not handle > >> the volume of mail.) But before you send it, please see if I have > >> sent a further message to debian-legal saying "enough!" > > > > Your question has already been posed, and the answer is found here > > > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2003/debian-devel-announce-200308/msg00017.html > > No, the question was (carefully?) biased, ruling out several options.
If your thesis is true, we'd expect to have seen many more votes for
option 4 ("none of the above"). Only 2 of the 63 votes counted (3.17%)
selected that option.
If you think the ballot was biased, perhaps you should support your
argument by identifying the premises that you think were illegitimate.
--
G. Branden Robinson | The key to being a Southern
Debian GNU/Linux | Baptist: It ain't a sin if you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | don't get caught.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Anthony Davidson
pgpvg5Y1MZpUI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
