Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a tapoté : > > So the next step seems obvious to me, Debian have make a choice: > > - follow the strict definition of DFSG promoted by many > > persons on that list and move the Official Debian Logo to > > non-free. > > - think about an another policy for logos or > > political/philosophical/historical texts. > > One could do that, but it wouldn't help because the FSF documentation > under discussion is neither a logo nor in the category of > "political/philosophical/historical texts".
The GNU Documentation under discussion _is_ in the category of political/philosophical/historical texts. Only these texts can be invariant in the GFDL. And the invariant option is the only philosophical issue (the rest are practical issues). > Are we going round in circles here? Apparently it was needed to one more time remind which kind of text can be invariant. -- Mathieu Roy Homepage: http://yeupou.coleumes.org Not a native english speaker: http://stock.coleumes.org/doc.php?i=/misc-files/flawed-english