Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My MUA is fine; the thread was broken by the fact that I was > replied to an email Adam sent me, and I CCed my reply to > debian-legal.
It's considered impolite to reply in public to private mail. > This email might break the thread again -- because I'm replying to > an email which wasn't sent to me, by copying and pasting out of the > list archives. > >> > I don't think that's necessary. Licenses are interpreted by >> > "reasonable men"; >> >>No. Licenses are interpreted by judges and/or juries. > > Judges and/or juries, who are assumed to be reasonable. I don't Your assumption is false. > see that there is any confusion inherent in a license which states > "You may do X if Y. You may do X if Z"; but even if there was > confusion, it is to be interpreted in a manner which makes sense. You should read up on some court cases. -- Måns Rullgård [EMAIL PROTECTED]