On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 17:22, Andrew Suffield wrote: > Actually, it's closer than you think. Any "product" [arbitrary > definition] that requires all three components is a derivative work of > all of them; that will almost certainly violate one or more of the > licenses.
It may be; it may not be. Not even the FSF contents that a shell script which requires bash is a derivative work of bash; a perl script of perl; etc. That's why its a discussion for another thread :-)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
