On Tue, 2003-12-16 at 16:07, Joe Moore wrote: > So, since I've never seen the "source" for the firmware files that started > this thread, I'd argue that verbatim distribution of the firmware image > (even in .o format) is permitted under the GPL.
Probably. It'd be interesting for them to try and sue over it...
"Well, your honor, when we told people they could distribute our
firmware under the GPL, we didn't actually mean they could
distribute it, legally..."
> But it still is not
> suitable for the Debian, because of DFSG#2
Quite.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
