Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > On Dec 23, 2003, at 13:21, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > >Huh? Why do you think that running a document written in Texinfo > >through a Texinfo interpreter makes the document a derivative work of a > >(specific) Texinfo interpreter? > > Because that's not what we're doing. We're running texinfo.tex and > foo.texi through the interpreter.
I still can't see why this should pose a problem. Do you think that makeinfo shares the same problem? Why? > I'm pretty sure various portions of texinfo.tex get copied to the > output. Which ones? Are they even subject to copyright? Sorry, you need much more convincing arguments IMHO.
