Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: >> Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>*This issue*, meaning leading someone to believe that something >>>non-Debian is Debian. That doesn't mean they should be limited to using >>>the logo only to refer to Debian, only that when referring to something >>>else, they can't say that that something else is Debian, whether or not >>>they use the logo. Is that not a clear difference? >> >> No, it's very unclear. The logo means Debian. Any use of it either >> refers to Debian, or refers to something that is not Debian, or is >> meaningless. If they use it to refer to anything else, they're >> infringing the trademark. > > I understand that much perfectly. What I'm suggesting that it is OK to > use it to refer to something that isn't Debian, as long as you don't > falsely claim that thing _is_ Debian, as stated below.
But the use of the logo itself is that claim. I don't see a way to do one without the other; can you provide one? -Brian -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]