Don Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So your argument is, in effect, that because we can't ship DFSG Free > computers (I mean, the system "requires" them after all) then we > should just give up and go home? > > Or are you trying to say that because we can't satisfy SC 1 for > hardware, we should also ignore it for software?
No. My argument is that the social contract is unclear and should be altered. A strict interpretation of it implies that we can't produce a useful operating system - since Debian exists in order to provide a useful operating system, we need to change that implication. -- Matthew Garrett | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
