On Wed, Apr 07, 2004 at 10:47:02AM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > If you are releasing a combined work which contains GPL'd code, the > entire work is derivative of each component, and must comply with the > license of that component. So yes, if you're shipping a bundle of > your software and psycopg, you have to offer the source for your > software as well. The fact that it uses python's import instead of > C's #include has nothing to do with it. > > On the other hand, if you rely on psycopg being a normal part of the > OS, and do not ship it yourself, then you do not have to ship the > source for your program:
To be on the "save side" we will probably using a BSD-licensed alternative to psycopg. Cheers, -- W. Borgert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, http://people.debian.org/~debacle/
