Martin Schulze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There seems to be some confusion about whether the GNU FDL renders > every document non-free or only those that include invariant > sections.
Personally, I think the GNU FDL is acceptable as a free documentation license, as long as the invariant sections are not overly long and do not contain essential material. However, debian-legal assumes that the GFDL with invariant sections is non-free, and there seems to be a majority for a general rejection as a free _software_ license (but the poll was worded quite carefully, after the "software is documentation" dogma). -- Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the following domains: atlas.cz, bigpond.com, di-ve.com, netscape.net, postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it, voila.fr.
