On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 01:07:59AM -0400, Glenn Maynard wrote: > On Sun, May 02, 2004 at 12:29:01AM -0400, Jaldhar H. Vyas wrote: [some attribution got lost here] > > > The Official Use logo is not under DFSG-free terms, and by my > > > understanding, it isn't intended to be. It is not allowed in the > > > Debian archive. I don't believe this is silly, bizarre or > > > hypocritical. > > > > I on the other hand think it is all of the above. What happened to > > the comittee that was looking into this? > > I don't recall a committee, and I'm not sure why there would have been > one. The OU logo is deliberately non-free--it would serve no purpose > if it was freely usable.
For the sake of my sanity, can we not use the abbreviation "OU" when the two things between which it's disambiguating are "Official Use" and "Open Use"? :) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
