On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 05:15:12PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote: > It is a factual accuracy that my derivate is "a GNU manual".
The key word here seems to be "is". Your derivative would *contain* a part of a gnu manual. > It is a factual accuracy that FSF makes money by selling hardcopies of > my derivate. I'd call this hypothetical. And, tangential. > > You can create a derived copy of the work which eliminates the > > content you don't want, and wrap the remainder in the required cover > > and include that as a chapter or appendix in some other manual. > > No. Cover texts has to go on the cover. Of the GFDL licensed component, not on the work as a whole. And, as I said in the message you were responding to, while the GFDL approach is unwieldy, it's less so than a "patches only" license could be. -- Raul
