> > That also has several solutions -- become a part of the FSF, or provide > > a disclaimer describing the issue.
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 11:09:01AM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote: > None of those solve the problem of making the license Free. Correct -- at the other end of this thread were some criticisms I had made on the factual accuracy of a document discussing GFDL issues. > > That said, is this statement one that's in use on any books provided > > by the FSF? I'd be much happier discussing this statement if I could > > read it. ... Josh Triplett quotes: > > Copies published by the Free Software Foundation raise funds for GNU > > development. Ah, thank you. Since this statement is conditional (it talks about the disposition of funds for the case where copies are sold by the FSF), I think it's pretty clear that it's accurate even before any copies have been sold by anyone. This means much of my previous commentary in this thread was rather pointless. -- Raul
