Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Here's where you start running into problems: GPL#2 requires you satisfy > GPL#1 for the modified work, which now includes stuff you do not have > the right to put under GPL's terms.
No, it says I may only *distribute* it under such a license. >> 4. I will write my files needed to integrate both, taking all the >> necessary precautions 3 a-d above. Notice that probably my files (unless >> completely unrelated) are derived works both of metafont and of gcc. >> -- no license violation. > > What are the appropriate license notices you've placed? How do they > satisfy the GPL requirements about the license on the work as a whole? "This is private work by Alyssa P. Hacker. No distribution is intended and no license is granted to any third party" -- after all, it's my personal copy and I really will never distribute it. -- Brian Sniffen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
