> > If there is no distribution or publishing going on -- if you are writing > > the additional code which is being incorporated into the program -- > > there is no problem. You have full rights to everything you write and > > you're giving everyone who has a copy (yourself) all the rights the GPL > > demands (for example, you have the right to give all others GPLed rights > > to this work).
On Sat, May 15, 2004 at 03:48:59PM -0400, Brian Thomas Sniffen wrote: > This conflicts with what you've been saying for the past week or so -- > you've been asserting that I can't combine gcc and metafont, or Emacs > and OpenSSL, without violating the GPL. > > Now you're changing your story. I thought I changed my story a while ago (when I looked up metafont and found it was available under the terms of the GPL)? Let's go for emacs and openssl. If there is no distribution of emacs+openssl, then there is no problem. Are you asserting that this is the case? -- Raul
